xmas

[image: an extemporary, candid shot of me engaging in unbridled Xmas cheer. circa 2014]

[image: an extemporary, candid shot of me engaging in unbridled Xmas cheer. circa 2014]

I am anti-Xmas.

Alright… Hang on… Perhaps not anti-Xmas so much as not a fan of the excessive hoo-ha (not to be confused with “hoohaa”, of which I am rather a fan) that obtrusively powers the steamroller it is.

Nope… Wait… What am I saying? I am anti-Xmas… even as I wish to temper the sentiment…

I’ve observed and examined my feelings regarding this, over the course of many years. For a long time, I’ve been quite clear on my perspective - only growing clearer as I’ve come to know myself more within the context of our society, culture and world. However, for an equally long period of time, I’ve tended to socially present certain reasoning that has watered-down my opinion (and my self), and / or has been largely self-deprecating in an attempt to duck judgement from others... “Oh, I'm a Scrooge...", "Yeah, I'm a Grinch...” (said with mocking relish), “Well, yes, significant beloved family members have died, so I must be anti-Xmas because I'm sad… and weird…”.

In actual fact, I am none of these things (ok, I’m sometimes sad and always weird… but I’m definitely neither a “Scrooge” nor a “Grinch”). My anti-Xmasism (as I now like to call it) exists because my core beliefs, values and views (and endeavours to authentically live by them) do not align with the predominant practices at this time of year. And just as I find myself indirectly apologising for it, I’m keenly aware I don’t want to anymore. I want to own my point of view, be at ease with it and even proud of it.

In saying that, I do not wish to be misconstrued. I am very, very happy to celebrate human connections and love and giving - in genuine forms - and I truly hope people are lucky enough to experience belonging and lightness and joy. But I wish such things for everybody all the time, while uncomfortably knowing there are a great many people for whom belonging and joy are painfully elusive privileges – even without the extra stress and alienation caused by such excessive materialism as abounds this time of year.

I’m also no Xmascist (I’m not here to perform some kind of Xmas exorcism on you). Although, I cannot lie, watching all and sundry maniacally engage with Xmas hoo-ha - wielding anxious demeanours, maxed out credit cards and utterly diminished self-determination - is remarkably akin to the disturbing trauma of watching a possessed child violently engage with her hoohaa with a pair of (let’s say, gift wrapping) scissors [this is a reference to a classic horror film, in case you didn’t know that and were therefore ever-more disturbed by the image I just presented]. I’d love to free you from it, if you want to be freed, but I most simply wish to express what seems to be my strangely taboo perspective on the whole shebang. If it’s not your thing, fine. However if it gives you moral support in your own already existing anti-xmasism, or some food for thought and action wherever you stand, then that’s great! You may, indeed, end up allowing yourself to avoid situations where your head rotates 360 degrees as you vomit copious amounts of Xmas pudding and mutter gravelly-voiced incantations at your extended family members (and all the offensive comments they make).

Side story: the last time I attended an extended-family Xmas gathering, I bit at some socially / politically inflammatory bait a somewhat-estranged uncle cast (no-doubt deliberately) into the conversational waters. The situation heated and escalated, of course. I ended up removing myself to find solitude and air in an uninhabited room… in tears... Another uncle (a great-uncle, or actually is he my second cousin or cousin once removed? - my dad’s cousin) came in to console me. He gave me a big, warm, comforting hug and with genuine care, concern and earnestness said, “Ahh, Meg… It’s ok… I used to be idealistic too…”

I’ll just leave that here… with you...

“I used to be idealistic too…”

I guess, when I was little, I participated in Xmas with some sense of investment and excitement. I had – and still have – a deep, insatiable longing to inhabit the hopeful reality of the imaginary… the magical… all that exists within the fringes and shadows of perception, understanding, possibility... I once yelled my dad into wounded humility when he accidentally, in my presence, alluded to Santa not being real (in conversation with one of my older sisters who, by then, was proudly across it) at an age when I should’ve - perhaps - already accepted it (I think I was about 9 years old, and my vehemence was no doubt due to the fact that – while I was, at the core of it, justifiably defending my right to believe in possibility and desperately upholding the sanctity of personal fantasy vs reality – I knew I was defending an idea that was, at best, rather shaky*). Oh, my poor, wonderful dad. Love to you, where’er you be. [ *i still very much believe in openness to possibility – in all areas of thought and life – it is a quality and attitude absolutely worth maintaining]

I also look back with nostalgia, laughter and love at the kooky (thanks to dad - the best!) way my unique family unit (my two sisters and dad) engaged with holiday time and festivities. For some reason, right now, I’m experiencing lightning flashes of vivid memories involving wearing underwear, or appropriately-coloured plastic bags (think old-school Grace Brothers), as festive headwear - always captured on camera, of course (I must try and find the evidence). We were definitely the black sheep of our extended family gatherings and I am beyond happy about that, even proud. I also recall being (and I am, still) grateful for the privilege of growing up in a comparatively stable, safe, loving, caring and creative home, where it was possible to spend (mostly peaceful, but for the odd sibling sling) holiday times together and engage in some kinds of seasonal festivities.

I really felt a longing to be together, then, with family - a serious yearning, undoubtedly due to the loss of my mother to an aneurysm when I was 7 - even through what became (as I grew in awareness) more apparent tensions inevitably and invariably arising when extended family members who shouldn’t have been spending time together forced themselves to out of some sense of obligation... to familial ties? ...to confused love? ...to “acceptable” social behaviour? ...to history and memory? …to loyalty? To what...? And why…? WHY…?! Why do we do this if it is not enjoyable and fulfilling?! [note: I know all extended (and immediate) families can experience such tensions. I’m also positive that any who claim not to are lying to themselves or to each other or to us (or are simply ludicrously, ludicrously, ludicrously lucky)! so there is no shame in it, people!]

I don’t recall ever feeling terribly invested in what I did or didn’t receive. I knew not to (and didn’t want to) expect anything and I was taught to graciously and gratefully accept any good-will gestures and gifts that came my way (regardless of whether I wanted or liked them). I don’t recall wanting or craving or comfortably asking for anything, especially particular things. In fact, I recall feeling extreme discomfort asking for anything at all (even when my dear dad was (I realise, now) trying to obtain some kind of helpful information to provide for three children he always felt somewhat inadequate providing for – there are understandable, moving reasons for this – another story…). I was also acutely aware that my dad was a single parent raising three young humans, and doing a damn good job (for all his flaws). For what more could I ask than what he was already giving? It seemed wrong. And broadly speaking, all the wanting (apparently by everyone, everywhere), to me, even then, seemed strange and distasteful.

I remember understanding it was a time to come together, to celebrate, to share and give. A time to focus on goodness of heart and generosity of spirit (again this confused me, because shouldn’t this be par for the course… in life… all year round…?). And I wish to stress, none of the above is because we were particularly well-off. It wasn’t that we were so comfortable we didn’t have to care. It’s actually because we lived very simply. While we were privileged enough to have a family and a home and holidays and community and celebrations, our house and household never had mod-cons or the newest gadgets or fashions or “desirable” things. We rolled with second hand. Hand-me-downs. Home-made. Black & Gold. No Frills. We existed within, and learned, a value system that wasn’t materialistic or social-status driven (within our family home, though one can never divorce oneself from wider community and society). I knew other people had all sorts of *things*, but I somehow never coveted them. Again, there were other things my sisters and I knew (were taught) to be more important - inner values, inner valuables.

“It is a complex time - for everyone!”

A point that can no longer be avoided is, I am not Christian. I do not follow any specific religion. I know the person in question existed and I agree with his compassionate, loving, healing, anti-capitalist, revolutionary tendencies… but he is not represented accurately in mainstream coverage and the many stories that surround him (including their imaginative, population-controlling creation, development and bastardisation across political ages) are deeply questionable (to say the least). There is so much bullshit the powers-that-be have pedalled, for no-one’s gain but their own. It should be an affront to all of us… Yet, it lives on, cozily couched in the chosen ignorance of seasonal *cheer* (however forced it is).

This, and the fact that so much of the tradition we identify as “Christmas” actually stems from non-Christian (pagan) background (to which my values align more fully), means you’ll never hear me call it “Christmas” (unless I’m wishing a person I know to be Christian “Merry Christmas”). I am vaguely happy (though not entirely, it’s still fraught with discomfort (because who-am-I to know what this time of year means or doesn’t mean (in all of life’s ways) to random individuals who cross my path)))* to wish people a joyous “festive season" and fun "festive times" and lovely “family and friend times” and good “holiday times”, cause that’s… you know… nice… But I usually won’t say any of this until I have spoken to someone long enough to know what their experience is at this time of year. It is a complex time - for everyone! (surely!) - yet, all the above phrases carry so many assumptions of uniformity and privilege they immediately negate the incredible diversity of individual social experiences. [*yes, that was three parenthetical thoughts nestled within each other, imbedded within an overarching thought, you’re welcome]

Again, to contextualise, I attended Anglican church when I was little - via my mum’s heritage and influence. I attended Xmas mass on some Xmas eves. I was even an alter girl, for a short while (maybe for a few months, a year or two after mum’s death), as I explored my then fascination for the concept of “spiritual purity” and experimented with perceptual and philosophical methods of making sense of existence. Thankfully (and I say this with awareness), my sisters and I were raised with many philosophies around us. And this was welcomed by Dad. We lived in a community of people with diverse backgrounds, lifestyles and outlooks. Dad engaged non-judgmentally with everyone; with every single experience, idea and perspective. And he allowed us the freedom to listen and engage and learn and choose and develop our own ideas and beliefs, as we grew. Indeed, I had exposure to / sought out / acquired philosophies that I connect to far more deeply than the – what I have found to be (I acknowledge this is not everyone’s lived experience) – damaging and hypocritical teachings of Christianity.

To extend… I believe in freedom of religion and religious practices (as long as they are not causing harm – which can come in physical, emotional, psychological and even financial forms), and I think there are (core?) tenets of Christianity (in their pure form) that are worthwhile. However, there’s also some deeply misguided, egregious, ungenerous, unloving stories, beliefs and views held in the name of the Christian religion that do cause harm (personally and socially). Christian dogma still permeates far too much of our cultural ethical / moral paradigms. Without question (this is a decidedly salient point), our political and social governance should not, in any way, be so inextricably intertwined with the beliefs, outlook and stance of the Christian (namely Catholic) church! Or any religion! No no no! [There’s a whole other world of discourse to be had here, regarding institutional power relationships and the types of control the powers-that-be exert over us.]

I understand a great many adults insist they persist with Xmas festivities (often in the required look, shape and feel of those marketed to us / jammed down our retching throats) “for the children”… I struggle to fathom the depth and breadth of difficulty inherent in denying one’s children involvement in a convention that seasonally crawls into every cranny of our culture (it’s grating jingles infusing the very air around us), especially when said convention involves promises of brand new, shiny stuff (that other grating jingles (and entitled day-care / school friends) have convinced the little tykes they want...). I acknowledge that I pushed through my “grinchiness” for my nephew and niece when both they and I were younger. On the flip side, for many years after my dad died (I was 24 when he died) I committed to carrying on traditions with (and for the joy of) my dearest, beautiful grandma (dad’s mum). Grandma absolutely LOVED Xmas, until her health declined with Alzheimer’s and she heartbreakingly lost her cheer (and some years later died too).

[image: gma. post-produced by my sister, sarah, and taken the xmas before gma died. omg i love her.

[image: gma. post-produced by my sister, sarah, and taken the xmas before gma died. omg i love her.

Side note: loss of loved ones to death or estrangement (however much these different experiences of loss are accompanied by unique details, variations and combinations of pain) is so deeply, keenly felt at these times - if and when a person has customarily been present - Xmas, birthdays, death-anniversaries, events and places made significant and potent by close experience... A loved ones (particularly recent, but also years-old) physical absence from the world is shockingly tangible. It is heavy and noisy, glaringly apparent. It is felt by all the senses and within every molecule of one’s heart and blood and bones. It shudders through the empty space they would otherwise inhabit. It hurts. And there’s no way around it. Just through it. (Love to all who are navigating this, in any way shape or form).

I ask… For those of us still here… Do we have to engage, if we don’t want to? ...if we don’t believe in it? Do we have to partake? For whose sake, really? Does it benefit anyone, if we’re doing it out of obligation? And if we’re stressing ourselves out in all the ways, how good can that be? And for what?! I know this will be triggering for people with kids, but I also ask what are we teaching young people if we simply play along with a cultural norm that we don’t actually believe in or worse don’t enjoy? What are we teaching them about consumption? About want vs need? About materialism vs spiritualism? Are we so overwhelmed by this particular current we have to swim with it to avoid drowning? Would we drown? Would our kids? Are we not actually drowning in it anyway? How might we go about changing the story, the focus, the culture at this time of year? In what ways can we boycott, rebel or revolt? I know, as pervasive as Xmas is, it’d be a rough time for little ones who weren’t permitted to partake. But it’s also worth noting that it’s already a rough time for all the little’ns (and big’ns) who genuinely struggle or can’t partake due to familial, social or economic circumstances.

“In what ways can we boycott, rebel or revolt?”

There are, of course, other options to full Xmas engagement. I’m an absolute advocate for “orphans” Xmas gatherings, “chosen family” gatherings, or opting out entirely and having time alone (as a number of friends of mine have done in recent years). Also choosing to get together and not exchange gifts at least removes the particularly heinous element of capitalist consumption. I think all these “alternative” options are wonderful for a lot of people, sometimes life-saving! I also know that, for those of us lucky and privileged enough to have holidays, it is one of the only times in the year when family and friends can all be free from other obligations, to be together in the same place at the same time. And this can make the Xmas period all the more potent. It is important, then, to acknowledge the value and privilege of community and choice. Again, not everybody has these. Choice, particularly, is a tricky one when it comes to all-pervasive cultural norms. People must first learn critical thought, how to see the reality of what they’re involved in, before they are able to buck it. And even then, going against the grain can create a wave of other interpersonal and social challenges that may not be worth it for some. Then again... if you try it, it may be...?!

The upshot is that willingly, happily, easily engaging in Xmas festivities requires a certain level of privilege (financial and social). I won’t hear anyone with any kind of privilege tell me that’s not the case. The psychological and emotional stress of Xmas on individuals (for many personal and social reasons) is palpable even for those with clear privilege. Add financial hardship, illness, homelessness, relationship (of any kind) tensions, family violence (it is no coincidence that family violence escalates at this time of year), familial estrangement, loss of family members to death, or a combination of any and all of the above and it only exacerbates the gruelling nature of the experience.

Considering this, it is disgusting how capitalism has co-opted, branded, packaged and sold us a social image we must fulfil at this time of year - along with all the garishly wrapped food, appliances, toys and non-biodegradable plastics we’re meant to buy and exchange to complete the picture - as the capitalist force (true-to-form) devours everything in its sphere. Not to mention how (again, true-to-form) it makes us feel inadequate if we do not or cannot participate. So… we buy into it…! We literally buy into it, people! The tragic-comic-tragic joke is on us. We are being played. And our pathological consumption, on all levels, is a depressing and disturbing horror show.

There is more I could write – more thoughts, more detail – but I’m sitting here in the physical and mental fog of 40 degree heat and 70% humidity, contemplating the fact that we’re all willingly (and unwillingly, because truly what power do most of us wield…? That’s an actual philosophical and socio-political question… and there are numerous complex answers…) contributing to Climate Change - the cataclysm of our time. Another “great flood” anyone? With chemical poisons dumped in? Or how about some roaring fires? Or mass species die-offs that impact entire ecosystems and ultimately our very own food sources?

Ok, I think I’m done. I’m gonna try and find those photos* I vaguely promised, earlier. I won’t be signing off with any grand conclusion. Instead, I’ll leave some links below to people who - more articulately and thoroughly than I - outline the lies of Xmas and merits of anti-Xmasism. [*There is one particular family photograph I desperately wanted to share, involving dress-ups in random red and white accessories - whatever we could find: enter the plastic Grace Brothers bag headwear (mentioned earlier), a candy cane for a cigarette and a small Clag Glue container being held like a gun (I’m about age 10/11?). I searched and searched and could not find it. I’m currently visiting family and I think the print is in a box at my place, approximately 737km away (I’ll be sure to update this post with it, should it be later located). In lieu of it, now, please accept my offer of the above pictures of myself and a fave one of my Gma, and this following screenshot of a digital photo of an awesomely awkward, weird, dark, blurry, smudged, badly composed print photo of (what must be) my 7 year old self with our family cat, still a kitten really (wearing what appears to be a Santa hat - though who can be sure?).]

[image: an awkwardly blurry photo of little me awkwardly sitting on this lounge with fritz wearing a santa hat and awkwardly reclining on my lap]

[image: an awkwardly blurry photo of little me awkwardly sitting on this lounge with fritz wearing a santa hat and awkwardly reclining on my lap]

I’m now gonna go spend some quality time with my sisters and nephew and niece and dear friends, all of whom I deeply love and wonder what I’d do without (even when things get (thankfully only marginally) challenging). I’m grateful and calmed that none of us here are concerned with buying into any Xmas hoo-ha. We just want to take this rare opportunity to all be in the same place at the same time, to catch up and love and care for each other. I acknowledge, again, the extraordinary privilege I have in this. And I send love to those who may not have access to such privileges. Please, dear people, also find below some contact information for services that provide advocacy and support to anyone doing it tough. This time of year is hard. It’s ok to not be ok.

Big love to all. I do hope, whoever you are and wherever you are, you’re able to have some good experiences with people you want to be with and things you like to do. If you have to work, I hope you’re treated well and paid well and, if you can’t afford a holiday, I hope you can find something lovely to do in the place you happen to be. If you can’t be with your beloved peops, because they are geographically elsewhere, or they have recently or long-ago passed away (and you’re missing them) or if you have other troubles and obstacles to your happiness or safety, I hope you find support in getting through. Take care of yourselves. I hope there is some cheer in there somewhere, somehow. And I genuinely hope the season, for all, can be navigated with as little stress, pain, consumption and waste as possible.

Love. Love. Love love love.

Megxo

🤗

“The Truth About Xmas”  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdIVIJ7-xfM&t=1s

“The Gift Of Death”  https://www.monbiot.com/2012/12/10/the-gift-of-death/?fbclid=IwAR1GkZbaczO16EWkwyyiuKZeb7B9SerIMxEmsbcyh4334hWoUBHMAphDgwo

❤️

Emergency: 000

Lifeline Australia: 13 11 14

Beyond Blue: 1300 224 636

1800RESPECT: 1800 737 732

Mensline: 1300 78 99 78

Relationships Australia: 1300 364 277

Kids Helpline: 1800 551 80

❤️

———

by megan drury

participationmystique 

the virgin-whore dichotomy

 
[image credit: megan drury (original photography: sally flegg | self)]

[image credit: megan drury (original photography: sally flegg | self)]

 

This. Is. Real.

I feel it in the different social behaviours I’ve become accustomed to enacting. I feel it in the socially learned responses of men and women to those behaviours. I particularly feel it woven into the fabric of heterosexual interactions (I identify as queer and engage in heterosexual relations) – in the way men perceive, appraise and treat me and my sexuality. I feel it very keenly in the energy I expend performing mental gymnastics, attempting to elucidate the behavioural choices I “should” and “shouldn’t” make in the interpersonal and sexual interactions I have with men – especially when I wish to be warm and friendly without being misconstrued OR wish to be sexually expressive and respected / valued as a human being. I also feel it simply walking along the street, fielding catcalls and unsolicited comments from strange men, as I independently go about my day.

So…

For those of you who don’t know, 'the virgin-whore dichotomy' describes a binary code of conduct imposed upon women, grown and sustained from the very roots (no need to pardon the pun) of patriarchal philosophy. It is the damaging precept that a woman is one of two things: she is either a “virgin” (read: innocent; naïve; passive; submissive; polite; obliging; implicit; indirect; responsive; dependent; pure; angelic; child-like; the ingénue whose behaviour and sexuality is entirely subservient to a corresponding male’s sexuality and second to her clean, compliant, modest nature) or a “whore” (read: knowing; aware; active; dominant; forthright; leading; explicit; direct; self-determined; independent; tainted; devilish; grown-woman-like; the femme fatale whose behaviour and sexuality is desired but, as it is not subservient to a corresponding male’s sexuality, shamed for being dangerous*, dirty, wayward, indecent), but she can never be somewhere in between or both or – goodness forbid – nowhere on any spectrum predetermined by patriarchal thought.

[*I have been called this more than once. The only meaning I can distil from it, within the contexts it was said (both playful and aggressive), is that the man feels like he is not in control of himself / his feelings / his responses / the situation / me. This threatens his socialised sense of gendered power (the harmful idea that men are always meant to be in control of every aspect of themselves and their lives and certainly their interactions with women, or they have failed) and someone must be blamed – the woman with whom he is interacting. This exposes a further problematic contradiction within patriarchal thought and behaviour: men being taught that, while they have to be in control (because that’s what and how men should be)they are ultimately not responsible or accountable for their feelings, choices and behaviours because, you know, “male biology”. 😏.]

The virgin-whore dichotomy manifests as a cultural policing of women’s desires, wants, needs, behaviours and sexuality to keep us defined and confined within these two narrow categories, created and controlled by patriarchal thought and the men and women who knowingly and unknowingly espouse it. Men and women have all been taught, through our shared patriarchal socialisation regarding men’s and women’s value, that men decide the value of a woman and that this is a measure to go by: one version of a woman is worthy of love and respect, extended attention and patronising care OR is valued as someone who will play mother and give care (a controllable entity that is not necessarily the object of unbridled sexual desire, but ‘valued’ as a service companion) and the other version of a woman (so many choices! 😃) is - while necessary (ie. all women are expected to be sexy, according to the male gaze, as well as immediately available to male desire) - ultimately worthless in terms of a respectful and meaningful, loving and ongoing, equal? connection (because, oops! you went and ‘debased’ yourself by meeting society’s stated expectations! Or worse! – you ‘debased’ yourself by having your own sexual agency! And / or your incredible sexuality is too much for the overwhelmed man to be able to trust).

Guess which one is which…?! 

😃.

You got it! 

Essentially we have all been conned into believing a “virgin” makes a good partner / baby-oven (Lol. How can a virgin make a baby?**) and a “whore” makes a good lover, but ne’er the twain shall meet! (Of course, they always meet because women are fully formed, conscious, complex, ever-evolving human beings with infinite aspects, and combinations-of-aspects, to who we are. So, things get very interesting when you’ve been classified a “whore” and annoyingly start to express vulnerability or feelings or something other than sexual desire, or you’ve been classified a “virgin” and unbelievably start to behave with too much certainty, independenceself-determination or autonomous sexual desire).

[**I am being deliberately obtuse, here. I completely acknowledge baby-making technologies and the numerous ways of creating non-hetero-parent families and ‘non-traditional’ family structures. I also acknowlegde how critical it is to utterly deconstruct the insane belief that a woman’s (terribly important) cultural status as a “virgin” or a “whore” (no matter how unconsciously this judgement is being made) is entirely dependent on if, when, how many times, in what way, for what purpose, and for whose pleasure her vagina has been penetrated by a penis... (WTaF?!)! My primary point above (**) is to highlight that this is where the other well-known name for this dichotomy comes from: “the madonna-whore dichotomy” (a Madonna being a representation of the Virgin Mary, who immaculately (ie. without having sex with anyone and with no assistance aside from the divine) conceived, carried and gave birth to Jesus (wow!) in the stories of Christianity. Oh...! Also… Jesus dated a prostitute, didn’t he…? The other Mary – Mary Magdalaine…? Woah! A "virgin" mother and a "whore" lover…! He was all over this binary, like a rash! Hang on, I just looked it up... Apparently, Mary Magdalene is sometimes confused with / combined with yet another Mary (of Bethany) and / or perhaps another woman altogether... who may or may not have been a repentant prostitute sinner...). So complex!]

 
[image credit: megan drury (original photography: sally flegg | self)]

[image credit: megan drury (original photography: sally flegg | self)]

 

On the topic of complexity – this binary is full of it. Another major form it takes is in keeping women ever-baffled and confounded, because it is impossible to strike the “right” balance (if one is caught up in trying to meet these outrageously contrary demands of patriarchal male desire and entitlement - being thrown at one from every angle - while also trying to keep a sense of oneself and find happiness in all of it… somewhere… 😐). Women are continually socially manipulated into seeking fundamental acceptance, respect and love by painfully navigating our way – in highly attractive, but remarkably uncomfortable, footwear – through a dimly-lit maze of one-way backstreets in an aggressively ill-designed, contradictorily signposted, shady and violent inner city suburb of the capital city of someone else’s double-standards.

And it SUX!

IT SUX!!!!!

Here are some examples: If you are a-sexual OR simply not interested in a particular man OR maybe don’t respond to the (intrusive / offensive / aggressive) *sweet-nothings* of strangers in cars or on the street, then you are a “bitch” / you are “frigid” / you are a rude, reserved, unfriendly form of a “virgin” (how dare you? they were endowing you with their desire and they are entitled to receive their desired response...); If you don’t smile enough or when you are told to OR you don’t immediately respond to or agree with the opinions or needs of a man OR you actively oppose them, then you are a “bitch” (oh, hello! this is a common go-to, isn’t it?!) / you are “difficult” / you are “too big for your boots” / you are “angry” / you are “hysterical” / you are a troublesome, quarrelsome, attacking form of a “virgin”… or is it a “whore” in this instance...? ... 🤔... It's not entirely clear... because you could just be a “frigid bitch” who “needs a dick up ya” to get you in line with the status quo OR you may be way too confident and cavalier regarding how many “dicks you’ve had up ya” in which case you’re a “slut”. (Hang on… a gal can’t seem to win…?! 🧐. The rules appear to be dizzying and fraught with flaws...?!).

"It’s a catch-22! You’re damned if you do and you’re damned if you don’t!"

If you are not interested in men (ie. you don’t care about “dicks” at all!) OR you are (oh, the horror!) a feminist, then you are a “man-hating bitch” (oop, there it is!) and probably just “need a good dick up ya” (LOL) to convince you to change your incomprehensible ways… (omg, see how ludicrous it is?!). If you appreciate and enjoy your own body and you are confident in it, you are “full of yourself” and it’s a “turn off” (because you are not relying on the man’s opinion of you to keep your sense-of-self and self-esteem afloat – “stuck-up bitch!”). If you openly enjoy sex and have sexual independence and agency you are, no question, a “slut” / you are “loose” / you are “easy” (and because men are taught that they are hunters and women are a prize ( 🤮), they need to work to win you and if you are won too easily or you happily and unashamedly have consensual sex with many partners, then you mustn’t be worth much). In certain circumstances, (and this… this is most foul, indeed) if you are the victim of sexual violence, it must be because you were giving off “whore” vibes, only to (then or now) turn around and play the “virgin”, not at all because the man or men are responsible for their actions and did something horrendously violent and criminal. (Also, aren't women all present to purely be at the whim of a man's desires? 😏).

The virgin-whore dichotomy is no theoretically light matter. This entrenched patriarchal scheme fundamentally, literally, directly informs rape culture and men’s violence against women. It is extremely treacherous. And in all the instances it doesn’t lead to direct violence, it still hurts us. It doesn’t even remotely reflect the fullness of who each and all of us truly are! It’s frustrating and upsetting and infuriating and disillusioning and disappointing and tiring and flabbergasting and hurtful and upsetting and frustrating and infuriating and disappointing all over again. And really the whole thing, in terms of heterosexual relationships, is genuinely extraordinarily unfortunate (if 'unfortunate' means: a stupid stupid stupidly horrible, unsatisfying, boring and unnecessary shame) given the full, abounding, deluxe, intricate, interesting, detailed and wonderful relations heterosexual men and women could have, if the entirety of each and every individual’s menu – all the varied, rich and changeable delicacies – were respected, appreciated and welcome on the table.

It gets exponentially shittier when intersectionality is involved: women of colour; women of different abilities; trans women; women who are only into women... These women all experience very particular nuances of this dichotomous mindset, due to specific bigotry they are already vulnerable to, as all of us – rich women, poor women, loud women, quiet women, younger women, older women, pierced women, tattooed women, vivacious women, reserved women, fat women, petit women, buxom women, intelligent women, funny women, polite women, ‘pretty’ women, 'plain' women, abrupt women, shy women, confident women, covered women, scantily-clad women, hairy women, women with children, women without children, women who wear makeup, women who don’t wear makeup, women who swear, women who love food, women who deny themselves food, women who love to dance, opinionated women, uncertain women, women who walk home alone, women who want sex, women who don’t want sex (and each of us are any combination of the above - with more or less complexity - at any one time, according to our own selves), athletes, scientists, actors, artists, doctors, sex-workers, engineers, nuns, lawyers, business owners, hospitality workers, community workers – all of us are judged and treated according to ‘culturally identifiable attributes’ (read physical, behavioural and situational social prejudices) that immediately place us, in consonance with this binary, in one camp or the other with no regard for the unique, self-determined individual inside.

It’s also important to note here that, as you can see, this duality is used to constantly put women down. This is the mastery of it – if you are shamed by our entire society for being anything and everything you are as a person and if you are utterly reliant on someone else’s opinion of you to validate your behaviours / your value / your existence, you are kept in a state of controlled distraction. Your energy is so consumed by trying to figure out the game and win it (not possible) that you are kept from doing other great things with yourself and your life (like taking to the patriarchy with a figurative wrecking ball – yes, that is an oblique popular-culture reference totally apt to this discussion – and diminishing it to rubble!).

 
[image credit: megan drury (original photography: sally flegg | self)]

[image credit: megan drury (original photography: sally flegg | self)]

 

As a structure of patriarchal oppression, the virgin-whore dichotomy is entirely based on what men want and when they want it - which is of course constantly shifting and changing. A woman must instinctively be a “virgin” when a virgin is wanted and a “whore” when a whore is wanted - at the whim of the men around her - or be subject to ridicule, abuse and rejection (though we are subject to those things anyway). And because one woman cannot possibly be both or neither, but all of us are both and neither, then the ridicule, abuse and rejection are constant. It’s a catch-22! You’re damned if you do and you’re damned if you don’t! Look at what history tells us has been practised in patriarchal cultures for centuries (it very clearly illustrates the binary): a man has a wife, and then he has a mistress (or two) because each of those things (deliberate word-choice) are for different purposes. [Guess which one is which…?! 😃. LOL. That is not a trick question].

Furthermore, it is possible for hetero men to bandy their sexuality about - along with their desires for intimacy and love - interact with partner after partner, or only one, or with a few on-the-side and remain blissfully unaware of the damaging duality they are buying into and unwittingly or knowingly enforcing. (Along with the countless benefits the patriarchal paradigm affords men - even though it’s ultimately no good for them, either*** - a lack of required self-awareness, regarding their own privilege and how they contribute to the oppression of women, is a good one!). 

[***Note this acknowledgement (without it being an excuse!) that patriarchal teachings about masculinity and how men are meant to be in this world are confusing, upsetting, challenging and damaging to men too. And it's all bad for all of us when combined with the terrible beliefs we've learned under capitalism (though it is difficult to clearly separate capitalist thought and patriarchal thought because they are inextricably bound-up together). Class, race, sexuality and ability are all intersectional issues for men too. None-the-less, in all cases, women culturally lose out. Laurie Penny, in “Unspeakable Things”, writes a very-well articulated passage related to this. Get it and read it.]

While guys might get to remain unaware of their conditioned dualistic perspective on women...

Women are totally suss to it, dudes! Because we are fucking living it. We are directly experiencing these frustratingly impossible and desperately untenable binary principles and expectations - our minds, hearts, bodies, choices, actions are impacted constantly by the perpetuation of this limited and oppressive splitting of ourselves. We are fighting for our full identities and self-determination, to exist in our entirety, without constantly being told that one or the other or every part of ourselves is - at any given time - unacceptable, unlovable, insufficient or wrong. We want to turn up completely in our rich and complex glory, be utterly present in our own right and agency, and not be punished for it. In fact, be genuinely celebrated for it (or allowed and excused - even when we do horrible things! 😏), like rich white straight men are, all the time, for all their cashed up boysy ways.

I have been part of a disturbing number of conversations (including well-intentioned, but way-off-the-mark, advice volunteered to me) recently, suggesting that if women want to engage in heterosexual interactions (flirtations / dates / relations / relationships / other) and want those interactions to be "more fulfilling", then perhaps these women shouldn’t have sex with men ‘too soon’ within the context of said interactions. Um… sorry?! What?! So… to have better dating experiences or relationships with men, hetero women should play the game that's created to keep them oppressed more strategically...? ( 😳. Here we are, back in those dark, one-way streets again!). Ie. play the part of the “virgin” (for an indeterminate length of appropriate time) before expressing sexuality OR (if choosing to express sexuality) play the part of the casual “whore” (for an indeterminate length of appropriate time) before developing or expressing vulnerability or feelings or a sense of genuine connection. 😴.

OMG! Nope!!!

NOPE!!!

To all my beautiful sisters… cis; non-binary; transgender; queer; lesbian; hetero; a-sexual… anyone identifying as a female, a girl, a woman; no matter your gender expression, presentation or your sexual orientation…

You are wonderful in all your complex, indefinable, textured, varied and changeable glory! There is nothing wrong with you, howsoever you choose to express the truth of who you are! If you are being shamed by a man for simply being you, or you have internalised a whole load of shame (this is rough, I know!), keep - whenever you can - reminding yourself that the issue IS NOT YOU! Of course, it is important to self-reflect and feel sure you've not been an unequivocal asshole, but anything short of that - in my experiences and observations - it is clear that women tend to (again, due to our socialisation) take far too much responsibility for the dynamics of interactions with men, compounded because men have also been socialised to not take any responsibility for the very same interactions! Gaslighting and shaming are horrendously common! 😠.

So, while it is not our responsibility to solve this (to single-handedly change it, fix it, overcome it, to alter our thoughts and behaviours so we’re not affected by it, to educate all the men in all the areas of our lives who speak out and act out these perspectives, to educate other women or female family members or friends or workmates who have internalised these perspectives) I do encourage you (if and whenever you feel able) to practise how it feels to not make it about you, or about a fault in you! It is a fault in our society, our culture! And when interacting with individuals who willingly or unwittingly embody and enact this fault in how they regard and treat women, practise seeing it in them. Practise naming it, practise releasing yourself from any perceived wrong. Make that clear (again, if you cannot or do not wish to spend energy making it explicitly clear to them, then practise knowing it within yourself!). And get your trusted sisters to help you with that too! Of course, some of us are in circumstances (related to this broad experience) that are difficult and hurtful and threatening in the extreme, and no amount of privileged reasoning can help. I believe, however, that social and cultural shifts are possible and that wider context impacts the minutiae of personal lives... so, I send love and heart and hope, and wish that current and future cultural shifts happen faster and bigger than ever before...

The operation of this oppressive system is designed to keep us all distracted and low. But, no!!! NO!!! NO!!!!! Hang in there. Keep fighting for the right to experience and express your full self! Stay connected wherever you can. And fight at the sides of others for their right too. Don’t let the bastards grind you down! (Yes, this is another apt literary / popular-culture reference: if you haven’t read or watched The Handmaids Tale, do).

Big love. 🙂. 💋.

Some definitions:

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Dictionary#dobs=virgin

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Dictionary#dobs=whore

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Dictionary#dobs=dichotomy

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=Dictionary#dobs=binary

-----

by megan drury

participationmystique

the new year

[image credit: megan drury]

[image credit: megan drury]

So...

Happy New Year, everybody! (we're only a few weeks in, I can still say that)!

How’s things? How has 2018 kicked off? Is it already proving to be better than 2017? Or have all those hopes been promptly dashed? Have you made some new year’s resolutions? Have you begun them? What did you achieve last year? What will you achieve this year? What did you set out to achieve last year, and not end up doing? What did you attempt, and fail? What are you likely to fail this year? Is your whole life just one big failure? What has neither been ‘success’ nor ‘failure’, but a big fucking mess of mediocrity? And will this mess of a failed life of mediocrity continue in perpetuity? Are you growing, personally? Or do you find yourself repeating the same old fucking patterns? What are you actually doing with your life? What do you really want to do? What is life? Fuck it! Should you even bother trying? Maybe it’s best to just curl up in bed (anyone’s bed) and sleep... yes?

Well…

You know what…?

Yes!

Maybe it is!

Preferably your own bed and preferably alone.

And not forever, just for little bits of time here and there.

As necessary.

But… Yes… Maybe, it is…

Our socialisation into the world of patriarchal capitalism has a lot to fucking answer for. We are taught very specific, damaging ideas about what traits and activities make people (us) worthwhile and valuable, what is deserving of accolade and award and what is deserving of rejection and punishment. These perspectives and judgements have grown from a conservative philosophy of patriarchal economic rationalism and the proclaimed merit of individual productivity. When we properly investigate the ideas, beliefs and practices inherent in this philosophy, it becomes exceedingly clear that the dominant narratives we learn about ourselves and each other are crafted purely to keep cultural and financial power structures in place.

Trying to meet the myriad impossible and contradictory standards and expectations of patriarchal capitalism: constantly striving for acknowledgement and social gain within a system we’re taught is a ‘meritocracy’, but is actually utterly classist, racist, misogynist, gender-biased, ableist and unequal in countless-other-ways; striving to be constantly ‘productive’, to clearly and visibly contribute to the system - according to the system’s values – purely to prove our ‘worth’ within it; living the lesson that consuming all the producing will assuage the horrible feelings we feel, when it often only exacerbates them; and (to add insult to injury) the nasty idea that if we don’t engage with the dominant beliefs and practices, we’ve inherently failed - again, by the system’s standards - and our comparative (always, it’s comparative, because an unequal system relies on competition) value as a human being is diminished (indeed, the validity of our very existence is thrown into question)... it is all deeply damaging to each of us as individuals, and to our society as a whole.

It hurts us in overt and undeniable ways, as well as in ways we sometimes aren’t entirely aware of and much less able to articulate. But we feel it. We know it. The prevalence of depression and anxiety is, to my mind, proof of this experience. It’s a horribly unsettling, upsetting and exhausting thing: to deny and work against our better sense of self, values, life and existence in order to play by the rules of a mean system; or to struggle to live by our personal truths, against the current of the overwhelming tide.

Now, while it can be tough, the latter is what I wish to encourage more and more, in myself and in all those around me, because that experience will always carry far greater meaning, value and fulfilment. And because the more we abide, comply with and advance our unhealthy socialisation, the more of our true selves we give away - to capitalism, to the patriarchy. As gravely ill-designed social structures, these systems do not care for any of us, at all (even those of us who evidently benefit from them the most).

Those of us who feel we are not ‘meeting our potential’, or ‘achieving’ what we ‘should be’ achieving, need to remember: we exist in a world specifically created to favour a few, while taking advantage of the rest. Those of us who feel we are ‘succeeding’, in given areas of our lives, need to remember: we exist in a world specifically created to favour a few, while taking advantage of the rest.

Thoughtfully and actively stepping outside this externally enforced success/failure binary does not then mean nothing matters or we shouldn’t bother trying to do anything. Not at all. The sentiment I'm expressing is not to say we should cease to feel wondrous, desirous, excited, motivated or cease action, motion, liveliness and exertion. Nor is it to say we should put a lid on our ideas, impetus, energy and drive. In fact it is to say the opposite. It is to say that, for our own wellbeing, our motivation needs to shift from constantly seeking external acceptance, affirmation and recognition from a system that thrives on making us feel inadequate, to fully acknowledging our internal values and taking action that genuinely inspires and nourishes us and those around us.

So... 

Truly restful downtime. Special, quiet solitude. Space to genuinely release yourself from the constant expectations of the external world – invading our minds and hearts at every turn - and touching base with your own, private, inner thoughts, feelings and truths... Withdrawing from it all, holing up (or something equally solo, quiet, nourishing, regenerating) - sometimes, regularly, often - is, I believe, absolutely required for personal recalibration (within our counter-intuitive human systems). And maybe we should all be allowing ourselves to do it far more than we do.

Or, if we don’t have the privilege (and it is a privilege) to pause and be transgressively idle, then - within our activity – to continually internally rail against our own unhelpful and unhealthful socialisation into perspectives on what makes us valuable or not (we have inherent value no matter what we do!) and find that space of deep, quiet, clear self - within. Make the revolutionary choice to exist inside it, heed it and act from it as the source, instead of psychologically and emotionally buying into the superficial bullshit society feeds us about what makes us substantial or insubstantial human beings.

To feel that we should continuously, seamlessly stay up to speed and cope with the incessant requirements of a largely externally prescribed lifestyle, within an entirely unequal social structure, within an ultimately counterintuitive dominant philosophical paradigm, is deeply unfair to ourselves - our genuine values, needs and desires. We must train ourselves, as a process of immunisation, to fight against the insidious, virus-like passing on of these ideas and beliefs that hurt us. In this case, we must learn to examine them, question them, see them for what they are and disrupt them in every big and little way we can.

Before we all continue dissing 2017 (there really has been a lot of that – poor 2017, I thought it was alright!), and diving headlong into unreasonably high hopes for 2018 (as though it’ll necessarily be some kind of new and improved personalised update of our social system’s “let’s make everyone as impossibly productive and consumptive as we possibly can” calendar year), maybe we all need to pause, take a deep breath, and dramatically reframe the way we see ourselves and our lives - ie. lower our socialised expectations of both.

In fact, don’t measure ourselves and our lives by socialised expectations at all! Exist and act outside them, entirely. Answer only to that feeling inside - that inexplicable knowing - of what truly matters to ourselves and to those around us. Then, by our own measure, the choices we make (from this place), our activities and ourselves (whatever and wherever they are) become immediately acceptable, worthwhile, valuable and loveable. Work less to “achieve” by external measures, and more to *meaningfully exist* by our own internal compass. Radicalise our definitions of 'value' and 'productivity' and contribute to changing the nature of ourselves, and our society, for the better.

There is a humanity, in all of us, safely existing beneath our socialised thoughts and behaviours – unreachable, untouched by the influence of the social structures we’ve been born into. We need to care for it, nourish it, nurture it and encourage it to sprout and grow and spread - throughout ourselves, our behaviours, our lives and our communities - like a creeping, beautifully flowering, edible weed. We can alter our entire personal and social ecosystems.

I’m leaving you with a quote that’s awesome, and some definitions. Have a read. Consider. Enjoy.

“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.” ⁃ Jiddu Krishnamurti

https://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&hl=en-au&q=Dictionary#dobs=worth

https://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&hl=en-au&q=Dictionary#dobs=value

https://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&hl=en-au&q=Dictionary#dobs=productive

https://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&hl=en-au&q=Dictionary#dobs=success

https://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&hl=en-au&q=Dictionary#dobs=construct

-----

by megan drury

participationmystique